About Journal
The Australian Journal of Biomedical Research (ISSN: 3083-4708) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of biomedical sciences. Published quarterly by the Australasia Publishing Group, AJBR fosters the dissemination of scientific knowledge across the Asia-Pacific region and globally.
Focus Areas Include: Molecular and Cellular Biology; Clinical and Translational Research; Pharmacology and Toxicology; Biomedical Engineering; Genomics and Proteomics; Infectious and Non-Communicable Diseases; Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research
Frequency: Quarterly
Article Types: Original Research, Reviews, Case Reports, Short Communications, Editorials
CURRENT ISSUE
Volume 2, Issue 3, 2026
(Ongoing)
Objective: This scoping review aimed to comprehensively map current evidence regarding the therapeutic applications, safety challenges, and ethical frameworks associated with CRISPR-Cas9 in human health.
Methods: A scoping review methodology guided by the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines was employed. Comprehensive searches were conducted across PubMed, Dimensions, and Embase for peer-reviewed English-language studies published between 2015 and 2026. Eligible studies focused on CRISPR-Cas9 applications in human health, including therapeutic interventions, safety evaluations, ethical analyses, and regulatory considerations. A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent thematic synthesis.
Results: CRISPR-Cas9 demonstrated substantial therapeutic promise across hematologic disorders, metabolic diseases, ophthalmologic conditions, oncology, immunotherapy, and rare genetic disorders. The most clinically advanced applications were observed in sickle cell disease, β-thalassemia, hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis, and hereditary angioedema, where clinical trials showed durable and potentially curative outcomes. However, major barriers remain, including off-target effects, genomic instability, delivery inefficiencies, immunogenicity, and limited long-term safety data. Ethical and regulatory concerns were prominent, particularly regarding germline editing, health equity, global governance, and accessibility.
Conclusion: CRISPR-Cas9 has demonstrated considerable clinical potential across a range of therapeutic applications, particularly for selected monogenic disorders in which the strongest clinical evidence is currently available. Although important advances have been achieved, broader clinical implementation will require continued improvements in editing precision, long-term safety evaluation, delivery technologies, ethical oversight, equitable access, and harmonized regulatory frameworks.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent ultrasound-guided multifetal pregnancy reduction at Kingswill Specialist Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria, between January 2014 and December 2024. All pregnancies followed assisted reproductive treatment. Reduction was performed between 6 and 12 weeks using ultrasound-guided cardiac puncture followed by aspiration of the selected gestational sac, without potassium chloride injection. Maternal characteristics, procedural details, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were extracted from clinical records and compared according to reduction before or at/after 8 weeks.
Results: Twenty-three women underwent multifetal pregnancy reduction. Mean maternal age was 32.8 ± 2.3 years, and median parity was 1 (interquartile range 0–2). Seventeen pregnancies (73.9%) were triplets and six (26.1%) were quadruplets. Reduction was performed before 8 weeks in 19 women (82.6%) and at/after 8 weeks in four (17.4%). Immediate post-procedure vaginal bleeding occurred in two women (8.7%), and no immediate post-procedure miscarriage was recorded. The take-home-baby rate was 100.0% before 8 weeks and 75.0% at/after 8 weeks. Earlier reduction was associated with higher mean birth weight, lower preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, lower preterm labour and fewer small-for-gestational-age births. No neonatal deaths or congenital malformations were recorded.
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided multifetal pregnancy reduction was feasible and associated with favourable outcomes in this Nigerian fertility centre.